Dopamine and risk choices in different domains: Findings among serious tournament bridge players

نویسندگان

  • Anna Dreber
  • David G. Rand
  • Justin R. Garcia
  • Miguel G. Vilar
  • Koji Lum
  • Richard Zeckhauser
چکیده

We explore how risk-taking in the card game contract bridge, and in a financial gamble, correlate with variation in the dopamine receptor D4 gene (DRD4) among serious tournament bridge players. In bridge risk-taking, we find significant interactions between genetic predisposition and skill. Among men with the 7-repeat allele of DRD4, namely 7R+ men, those with more bridge skill take more good risks and fewer bad risks, while the opposite is found for less-expert 7R+ men. Conversely, skill does not predict risk-taking among men without the 7R+ allele. Consistent with some prior studies, we also find that 7R+ men take more risk in the financial gamble. We find no relationship between 7R+ and either risk measure among our female subjects. Our results suggest that the dopamine system plays an important role in individual differences in risk-taking among men, and is the first to distinguish between advantageous and disadvantageous risk-taking. J Risk Uncertain (2011) 43:19–38 DOI 10.1007/s11166-011-9119-z A. Dreber Institute for Financial Research (SIFR), Stockholm, Sweden D. G. Rand Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA N. Wernerfelt Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA J. R. Garcia :M. G. Vilar : J. K. Lum Laboratory of Evolutionary Anthropology and Health, Departments of Biological Sciences and Anthropology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA R. Zeckhauser (*) Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Mailbox 41, 79 John F. Kennedy Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA e-mail: [email protected]

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Dopamine Receptor D4 Gene (DRD4) and Self-Reported Risk Taking in the Economic Domain

Background: Recent evidence suggests that individual variation in risk taking is partly due to genetic factors. Methodology/Principal Findings: We explore how self-reported risk taking in different domains correlates with variation in the dopamine receptor D4 gene (DRD4). Past studies conflict on the influence of DRD4 in relation to risk taking. A sample of 237 serious tournament contract bridg...

متن کامل

The Role of Deliberate Practice in Chess Expertise

Two large, diverse samples of tournament-rated chess players were asked to estimate the frequency and duration of their engagement in a variety of chess-related activities. Variables representing accumulated time spent on serious study alone, tournament play, and formal instruction were all significant bivariate correlates of chess skill as measured by tournament performance ratings. Multivaria...

متن کامل

NO TRUMP!: A statistical exercise in priming

Abstract: How are people unconsciously influenced by the rise of Donald Trump? We test the theory that Trump’s rise has irrationally changed the behavior of one group of people: elite bridge players, whom we assume are otherwise completely typical. We examine the hands played in one of the premier North American bridge events, the Vanderbilt Knockout Tournament, in 1999 and 2015. We find that p...

متن کامل

1 Card Games and Economic Behavior

We wonder whether different game experiences are associated with significant differences in experimental behavior and, more specifically, whether expert bridge players, due to their superior team play habits, are more likely to adopt cooperative behavior than expert poker players. Evidence from trust games shows that bridge players make more polarized choices and choose the maximum trustor cont...

متن کامل

Optimal risk taking in an uneven tournament game with risk averse players

Weanalyze the optimal choice of risk in a two-stage tournament gamebetween twoplayers that have different concave utility functions. At the first stage, both players simultaneously choose risk. At the second stage, both observe overall risk and simultaneously decide on effort or investment. The results show that those two effects which mainly determine risk taking – an effort effect and a likel...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011